In family court, the idea of "blind justice" can sometimes be problematic, especially when it comes to situations involving abuse. The legal system is ideally intended to protect vulnerable individuals and ensure fair treatment, but in practice, an overly rigid application of "blind justice" can sometimes fail to account for the complexities of abusive dynamics, power imbalances, or the psychological and emotional trauma that victims and their children face.

For example, if a judge is too focused on an impartial, one-size-fits-all application of the law, they might overlook critical aspects of a case, like the history of manipulation, control, or gaslighting that an abuser may use to sway the legal process. In these circumstances, justice needs to be more attuned to the realities of the situation and not simply "blind" to the lived experiences of those involved.

Many advocates believe that family court needs to be more aware of these dynamics, especially when it comes to domestic violence or child abuse cases, so that the system can better protect victims rather than unintentionally enabling abusers. A more nuanced approach that understands and addresses the subtleties of these cases is crucial for justice to truly be served, especially where coercive control exists.